<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Verizon, .002 cents != .002 dollars</title>
	<link>http://www.tssci-security.com/archives/2006/12/09/verizon-002-cents-002-dollars/</link>
	<description>top secret/secure computing information</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Marcin</title>
		<link>http://www.tssci-security.com/archives/2006/12/09/verizon-002-cents-002-dollars/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 01:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tssci-security.com/archives/2006/12/09/verizon-002-cents-002-dollars/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>The recording is available at http://media.putfile.com/Verizon-Bad-Math</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The recording is available at <a href="http://media.putfile.com/Verizon-Bad-Math"  onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/media.putfile.com');">http://media.putfile.com/Verizon-Bad-Math</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve B.</title>
		<link>http://www.tssci-security.com/archives/2006/12/09/verizon-002-cents-002-dollars/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 01:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tssci-security.com/archives/2006/12/09/verizon-002-cents-002-dollars/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Have you heard the recording?  It is floating around on the web, do a search and I'm sure you can find it.  They guy confirmed on numerous occasions during the 20+ minutes that they were quoting him for .002 cents.  In fact, it is reference in the recording that he had called previously to find out the cost, and was told that while roaming in Canada he'd be charged .002 cents per KB.  He called back when instead of being charged 72 cents for his roughly 35 MB data transfer, he was charged $72 dollars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you heard the recording?  It is floating around on the web, do a search and I&#8217;m sure you can find it.  They guy confirmed on numerous occasions during the 20+ minutes that they were quoting him for .002 cents.  In fact, it is reference in the recording that he had called previously to find out the cost, and was told that while roaming in Canada he&#8217;d be charged .002 cents per KB.  He called back when instead of being charged 72 cents for his roughly 35 MB data transfer, he was charged $72 dollars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CJ</title>
		<link>http://www.tssci-security.com/archives/2006/12/09/verizon-002-cents-002-dollars/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>CJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 19:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tssci-security.com/archives/2006/12/09/verizon-002-cents-002-dollars/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>He didn't deserve a refund.  And its surprising that he had to call in to even have $.002 explained.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He didn&#8217;t deserve a refund.  And its surprising that he had to call in to even have $.002 explained.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC</title>
		<link>http://www.tssci-security.com/archives/2006/12/09/verizon-002-cents-002-dollars/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tssci-security.com/archives/2006/12/09/verizon-002-cents-002-dollars/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>I'd be pretty pissed off. They "gave" him $71.79.... but if you think about it, for that annoying ass time, he really only saved 71....cents. That sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be pretty pissed off. They &#8220;gave&#8221; him $71.79&#8230;. but if you think about it, for that annoying ass time, he really only saved 71&#8230;.cents. That sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.209 seconds -->
