Comments on: Google Chrome first look http://www.tssci-security.com/archives/2008/09/02/google-chrome-first-look/ top secret/secure computing information Sun, 27 Mar 2011 12:47:22 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: e http://www.tssci-security.com/archives/2008/09/02/google-chrome-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-26821 e Sat, 23 May 2009 20:41:08 +0000 http://www.tssci-security.com/archives/2008/09/02/google-chrome-first-look/#comment-26821 To add scroogle, you have to use this url: http://www.scroogle.org/cgi-bin/nbbw.cgi?Gw=%s where %s is the search phrase To add scroogle, you have to use this url:
http://www.scroogle.org/cgi-bin/nbbw.cgi?Gw=%s
where %s is the search phrase

]]> By: VG for .Net http://www.tssci-security.com/archives/2008/09/02/google-chrome-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-19331 VG for .Net Mon, 29 Dec 2008 13:20:12 +0000 http://www.tssci-security.com/archives/2008/09/02/google-chrome-first-look/#comment-19331 I can't say more about the technical issues for Chrome, as i am not the person from techniques. For me the Chrome really works good. I am satisfied with the speed and all stuff. I can’t say more about the technical issues for Chrome, as i am not the person from techniques. For me the Chrome really works good. I am satisfied with the speed and all stuff.

]]> By: dre http://www.tssci-security.com/archives/2008/09/02/google-chrome-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-13751 dre Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:42:54 +0000 http://www.tssci-security.com/archives/2008/09/02/google-chrome-first-look/#comment-13751 @ Dominic: thanks for the comment. I'm probably not going to try again, but I did use the SSL Scroogle. It could have been user-error on my part. @ Dominic: thanks for the comment. I’m probably not going to try again, but I did use the SSL Scroogle. It could have been user-error on my part.

]]> By: Dominic White http://www.tssci-security.com/archives/2008/09/02/google-chrome-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-13692 Dominic White Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:22:46 +0000 http://www.tssci-security.com/archives/2008/09/02/google-chrome-first-look/#comment-13692 I installed Scroogle no problem as my default search. I used the SSL version, maybe that is the difference? I installed Scroogle no problem as my default search. I used the SSL version, maybe that is the difference?

]]> By: Shoaib Yousuf http://www.tssci-security.com/archives/2008/09/02/google-chrome-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-13530 Shoaib Yousuf Sun, 07 Sep 2008 22:25:07 +0000 http://www.tssci-security.com/archives/2008/09/02/google-chrome-first-look/#comment-13530 * It does separate tabs by process. IE8 has had this (or similar) already, I confirmed this at Tech.Ed last week and found a link here http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2008/03/11/ie8-and-loosely-coupled-ie-lcie.aspx * It does separate tabs by process.

IE8 has had this (or similar) already, I confirmed this at Tech.Ed last week and found a link here

http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2008/03/11/ie8-and-loosely-coupled-ie-lcie.aspx

]]> By: dre http://www.tssci-security.com/archives/2008/09/02/google-chrome-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-13100 dre Wed, 03 Sep 2008 03:41:05 +0000 http://www.tssci-security.com/archives/2008/09/02/google-chrome-first-look/#comment-13100 I did the following steps (or ones just like them) on my own, and clearly they came up with similar results: http://erratasec.blogspot.com/2008/09/lookingglass-vendor-of-week-google.html http://www.disenchant.ch/blog/lets-crash-googles-chrome-browser/184 I did the following steps (or ones just like them) on my own, and clearly they came up with similar results:

http://erratasec.blogspot.com/2008/09/lookingglass-vendor-of-week-google.html
http://www.disenchant.ch/blog/lets-crash-googles-chrome-browser/184

]]> By: Lucius http://www.tssci-security.com/archives/2008/09/02/google-chrome-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-13096 Lucius Wed, 03 Sep 2008 03:12:09 +0000 http://www.tssci-security.com/archives/2008/09/02/google-chrome-first-look/#comment-13096 Ahhh - worked out the Sun Java - need the 1.6 Release Candidate 10. Ahhh – worked out the Sun Java – need the 1.6 Release Candidate 10.

]]> By: Lucius http://www.tssci-security.com/archives/2008/09/02/google-chrome-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-13093 Lucius Wed, 03 Sep 2008 02:34:41 +0000 http://www.tssci-security.com/archives/2008/09/02/google-chrome-first-look/#comment-13093 Since it installs entirely in user mode, and stores itself entirely in the users profile, it does not need anything in the system account. Services are installed into the system account. Using a HKCU run for the updater makes sense then. I don't know how good its Javascript support is yet, but it does not seem to work with Sun Java. It certainly is constantly talking to Google.com while it runs. Since it installs entirely in user mode, and stores itself entirely in the users profile, it does not need anything in the system account. Services are installed into the system account. Using a HKCU run for the updater makes sense then.

I don’t know how good its Javascript support is yet, but it does not seem to work with Sun Java.

It certainly is constantly talking to Google.com while it runs.

]]> By: romain http://www.tssci-security.com/archives/2008/09/02/google-chrome-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-13067 romain Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:29:24 +0000 http://www.tssci-security.com/archives/2008/09/02/google-chrome-first-look/#comment-13067 I'm not exactly sure what view you take on this piece of software, but for me this is an overall good browser for a typical user: - very fast - they thought of security simple stuff (sand boxed processes) - simple The more I look at Chrome, the more I see a direct competitor for Opera (definitely too light for ffx and IE). Also, this is the very first public release of this browser, so I guess they will make tons of improvements. It's for me too early to say anything about the security here but if you find vulnerabilities, let's say in V8 :) I’m not exactly sure what view you take on this piece of software, but for me this is an overall good browser for a typical user:
- very fast
- they thought of security simple stuff (sand boxed processes)
- simple
The more I look at Chrome, the more I see a direct competitor for Opera (definitely too light for ffx and IE).

Also, this is the very first public release of this browser, so I guess they will make tons of improvements. It’s for me too early to say anything about the security here but if you find vulnerabilities, let’s say in V8 :)

]]> By: David Gerard http://www.tssci-security.com/archives/2008/09/02/google-chrome-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-13062 David Gerard Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:42:01 +0000 http://www.tssci-security.com/archives/2008/09/02/google-chrome-first-look/#comment-13062 "We are so, so happy with Google Chrome," mumbled Mozilla CEO John Lilly through gritted teeth. "That most of our income is from Google has no bearing on me making this statement." - <a href="http://notnews.today.com/?p=57">http://notnews.today.com/?p=57</a> “We are so, so happy with Google Chrome,” mumbled Mozilla CEO John Lilly through gritted teeth. “That most of our income is from Google has no bearing on me making this statement.” – http://notnews.today.com/?p=57

]]>